The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert | |||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Subscribe to the Newsletter Helpful Links Texas Consumer Complaint Center Credit Reports and Identity Theft Your Guide to Small Claims Court Contact Us 1-713-743-2168 |
The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the DayIn honor of Hispanic Heritage Month, the FTC will focus on ways to come together to help spot, stop, and report frauds that target Latino communities. Today kicks off their month-long series with advice they hope you’ll share with others on how to recognize and avoid scams. Click here for more. Consumers finding more opportunities to buy now, pay laterFor years credit card companies have reaped the benefits of consumers’ shift to online shopping — this is because nearly all virtual shoppers pay with a credit card. But, lately, consumers have found an alternative. Your MoneyWith mortgage interest rates remaining low compared to historic averages, many people are financing their home purchases – a move that makes a lot of financial sense. Whenever you buy a property and intend to take out a mortgage on it, whether it be a house, condo or cooperative, all mortgage lenders will require an appraisal, which is an unbiased estimate of the true or fair market value of the property. All lenders order an appraisal during the mortgage loan process so that there is an objective way to assess the home's market value, and ensure the amount of money requested by the borrower is appropriate. However, getting a mortgage, or accepting an offer that is contingent on financing (many offers are), complicates a purchase transaction. It can potentially place both the buyer and seller in a unique circumstance: an appraisal gap. Many buyers and sellers are blissfully unaware of what this term means and the possible complications, and delays, it can cause for a contingent sales transaction. Click here for more. For the LawyersArbitration agreement unenforceable under TAA or FAA. The court first considered whether the agreement was valid under the Texas Arbitration agreement. The court stated, the TAA " does not apply to . . . an agreement for the acquisition by one or more individuals of property . . . in which the total consideration to be furnished by the individual is not more than $50,000" unless the arbitration agreement is in writing and "the agreement is signed by each party and each party's attorney." In the instant case, each of Thomas's purchases was for less than $50,000, but it is undisputed that there is no written arbitration agreement signed by Thomas and her counsel. The court also found the arbitration clause invalid under the federal Arbitration because there was no written agreement to arbitrate. Nationwide Coin & Bullion Res., Inc. v. Thomas, 2020 Tex. App. Click here for more. |
||
To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here. |