The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert | |||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Subscribe to the Newsletter Helpful Links Texas Consumer Complaint Center Credit Reports and Identity Theft Your Guide to Small Claims Court Contact Us 1-713-743-2168 |
The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the DayEconomic impact payments from the government might help deal with financial stress during this pandemic, but some people may look for other ways to borrow money for a short period of time. They may consider options like a payday loan or a car title loan, which can be very expensive. Here’s what you need to know. Click here for more. Credit card companies lower credit limits as the pandemic rolls onIn February, before the pandemic took over, the likelihood of a consumer’s application for a credit card limit increase being rejected was at a six-year low. Your MoneyMore than 22 million Americans have filed for unemployment benefits in the past four weeks. They may be eager to get the money, but they may not be thinking about how the benefits are taxed. The federal government taxes unemployment benefits as ordinary income (like wages), but you don't have to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes on this income. Click here for more. For the LawyersCourt adopts the “face-of-the-award” rule for dealing with arbitrator errors in damage calculations under Section 11(a) of the FAA The Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals adopted the “face-of-the award” rule, despite granting “double recovery” to an elderly couple. The couple’s expert testified their out-of-pocket losses were about $292,000 and their actual damages, based on returns from appropriate investments, were between $485,000 and $610,000. In their final prayer for relief at the hearing, the couple asked only for market-adjusted damages. The FINRA arbitrators found for the couple and awarded them both their net out-of-pocket and their market adjusted damages of $777,092, plus interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs. The couple moved to confirm the award, arguing the court could modify the award to correct the alleged double recovery only if there was an “evident material miscalculation of figures” on the face of the award. The U.S. District Judge agreed with the couple and adopted the “face-of-the-award” rule which holds that a miscalculation or mistake is “evident” only if it appears in the award. The Tenth Circuit affirmed. With this decision, the 10th Circuit joins the Fourth, Sixth, and Eleventh Circuits in affirming the “face-of-the-award” rule, widening the split in the circuits. The Fifth and Seventh Circuits allow courts to consider some parts of the record. Mid Atl. Capital Corp. v. Bien, No. 18-1195, 2020 WL 1860125 (10th Cir. Apr. 14, 2020). Click here for more. |
||
To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here. |