The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert
Center for Consumer Law
  Volume 128 Number 10

Subscribe to the Newsletter
Forward this news alert to your family and friends

Helpful Links

Texas Consumer Complaint Center

Your Rights as a Tenant

Credit Reports and Identity Theft

Your Guide to Small Claims Court

Common Q & A’s

Scam Alert

Back Issues

Contact Us

http://www.peopleslawyer.net

1-713-743-2168

Unsubscribe

The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the Day

Do business with companies you know or that come recommended by those you trust. Check out companies with the Better Business Bureau before making major purchases. Click here for more.


AT&T and Time Warner Agree to Merge

Over the weekend, AT&T proposed to buy Time Warner for about $85 billion. If the deal goes through it will be one of the largest media mergers ever. However, the federal government still has to approve the sale and will likely review the deal under tough scrutiny. Time Warner is home to HBO and CNN. Media companies have been pressured to merge with the rise of Netflix, YouTube, and Amazon Prime, which are hurting traditional cable companies. Critics say that the deal would threaten innovation and freedom of information for consumers.  Click here for more.


Your Money

If you were billed on your credit card statement for merchandise you never received, federal law may help you. Two federal laws — the Mail, Internet or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule and the Fair Credit Billing Act — offer protections and procedures so you don’t have to pay for merchandise you ordered but never got. Before utilizing your protections under the law, first try to resolve your problem with the seller. If that does not work, then under law most items bought by mail, phone, fax, or online must be shipped by the time stated in its ads or on the phone. If the seller is unable to ship within that time, it must notify you, give you a new shipping date, and give you the chance to cancel for a full refund.  Click here for more.


For the Lawyers

Court refuses to certify a class action based on alleged late filing of mortgage satisfaction. Citing Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1548 (2016), the Eleventh Circuit held that, because the lead plaintiff did not allege the violations actually caused him any harm or could do so, he lacked standing to sue. Thus, the Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Nicklaw v. CitiMortgage, Inc (11th Cir. 2016). Click here for more.

 

To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here.