The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert
Center for Consumer Law
  Volume 110 Number 10

Subscribe to the Newsletter
Forward this news alert to your family and friends

Helpful Links

Texas Consumer Complaint Center

Your Rights as a Tenant

Credit Reports and Identity Theft

Your Guide to Small Claims Court

Common Q & A’s

Scam Alert

Back Issues

Contact Us

http://www.peopleslawyer.net

1-713-743-2168

Unsubscribe

The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the Day

How do you know if something is fact or “urban legend”? The next time someone tells you about a way to make a lot of money, get free gift certificates, secret codes for withdrawing money from an ATM, chain-letters that work, strange effects from everyday products, or anything else that just doesn’t seem right, check it out here.
 Click here for more.


New York Attorney General Questions eBay and PayPal About Robocall Policies

Recently eBay and PayPal changed their privacy policies to allow them to use "autodialed or prerecorded calls or text messages" to contact their users about almost any issues, from debt collection to sales calls. The inquiry from the New York Attorney General points out that the expansive change to permit robocalling to users for any issue may violate U.S. laws regarding debt collection and telephone privacy.

 Click here for more.


Your Money

There are over 2700 rules in the Social Security Handbook, and navigating them can be difficult. You almost have to be your own social security expert to make sure that you are maximizing the benefits to which you are entitled. This link gives you 10 tips to get more from Social Security. Click here for more.


For the Lawyers

Connecticut Appeals Court upholds arbitration award of punitive damages and attorney's fees in the amount of $170,000 against homeowners who designed and posted a website defaming a home contractor with whom they had a billing dispute over $25,000. While the appeals court acknowledged that the arbitrator may have erred in using the lesser “malice in fact” standard in making the award, and not made the “actual malice” finding that was required, the error was not a “manifest disregard of the law” that would require setting aside the arbitrator’s decision. SBD Kitchens, LLC. v. Jefferson, 2015 Conn. App. (June 16, 2015). Click here for more.

 

To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here.