The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert
Center for Consumer Law
  Volume 95 Number 7

Subscribe to the Newsletter
Forward this news alert to your family and friends

Helpful Links

Texas Consumer Complaint Center

Your Rights as a Tenant

Credit Reports and Identity Theft

Your Guide to Small Claims Court

Common Q & A’s

Scam Alert

Back Issues

Contact Us

http://www.peopleslawyer.net

1-713-743-2168

Unsubscribe

The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the Day

Are you tired of receiving offers for new credit cards? You can opt out for five years!

 Click here for more.


Hot Pockets Recalled for Diseased Meat

Are you thinking about having a Hot Pocket for lunch or dinner? If so, you might want to check the label first.



On Tuesday, Nestlé announced that several varieties of the popular product have been recalled after it was discovered that some of the meat could have come from "diseased and unsound animals."



Consumers with questions about the Hot Pocket recall can contact Nestlé at (800)392-4057. Consumers can check affected labels here.


 Click here for more.


Pros & Cons of a New Minimum Wage

Earlier this year, President Obama announced he would support legislation to increase the minimum wage. During the State of the Union, the President expressed concerns over the stagnant minimum wage. Currently set at $7.25 per hour, President Obama made it clear he would like to see the minimum wage increased to $10 per hour.



As with any major policy change, supporters and detractors are out in force. Generally speaking, republicans believe that an increase in the minimum wage would hurt jobs. Democrats insist an increase in minimum wage would increase productivity and decrease turnover. Furthermore, they believe such an increase would have a nominal affect on jobs, but make big waves in fighting poverty.



Who is right? Is it time to increase the minimum wage?


 Click here for more.


Your Money

What's it worth to reduce your spending?
 Click here for more.


For the Lawyers

Law school tuition not paid for personal, family or household purpose was primarily for the purpose of operating a business.

The Sixth circuit held that the Michigan Consumer Protection Act did not apply to law school graduates action against law school. The court relied on the students’ complaint that stated they intended to use their law degrees to better themselves, “through the attainment of full-time employment in the legal sector.”
Click here for more.

 

To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here.