The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert | |||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Subscribe to the Newsletter Helpful Links Texas Consumer Complaint Center Credit Reports and Identity Theft Your Guide to Small Claims Court Contact Us 1-713-743-2168 |
The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the DayIf you're a senior citizen, you're a target for scammers. The latest is the “grandmother scam,” where the thief calls pretending to be a grandchild in trouble. If you get such a call, ask a question only your relative could answer, and then call back on the relative’s phone number. A Look At NSA Surveillance ProgramsThe United States government is under attack from citizens upset over the revelations surrounding its surveillance techniques. Recently, whistleblower Edward Snowden released information detailing the government's collection of metadata (US citizens' phone and Internet records). Florida Makes Pot Paraphernalia IllegalOver the weekend, Florida Governor Rick Scott signed into law a ban on certain types of pipes commonly used to smoke marijuana. Pesticides Found in Celestial Seasonings TeaAccording to a study conducted by Glaucus Research, Celestial Seasonings tea contained potentially dangerous levels of multiple pesticides. Ten out of eleven varieties contained excess pesticides, including the popular Sleepytime tea. Your MoneyShould you consolidate your debt into a new loan?
For the LawyersTruth in Lending Act plaintiff does not have to sue to protect rescission right. The Third Circuit held that home borrowers were not required to formally file suit before the Truth in Lending Act’s three-year limitation period expired in order to preserve their right of rescission. Under TILA, consumers have an absolute right to rescind for three business days after closing on a home loan. The right to rescind is extended to three years if the lender fails to make requisite disclosures at the time the loan is made. Within three years of closing, the plaintiffs wrote a letter informing their lenders that they intended to rescind the loan based on their failure to receive the required TILA disclosures. When the lenders objected, the plaintiffs sued for rescission in federal court. The lenders argued that the plaintiffs had failed to preserve their rescission rights because their lawsuit was actually filed more than three years after closing. But the court concluded that the plaintiffs preserved their rescission rights when they sent the lenders the letter.
|
||
To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here. |