The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert
Center for Consumer Law
  Volume 86 Number 5

Subscribe to the Newsletter
Forward this news alert to your family and friends

Helpful Links

Texas Consumer Complaint Center

Your Rights as a Tenant

Credit Reports and Identity Theft

Your Guide to Small Claims Court

Common Q & A’s

Scam Alert

Back Issues

Contact Us

http://www.peopleslawyer.net

1-713-743-2168

Unsubscribe

The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the Day

Never give your social security number to someone you do not know. Identity theft requires a social security number. Protect yours.



For more general information about the law, check out my website.

 Click here for more.


Hospital Procedure Prices Can Vary Greatly

How much will a hospital charge you or your insurance company for a procedure?




On Wednesday, the Obama Administration released a report to show consumers how much hospitals are charging. From pneumonia to diabetes, the report details price information for 100 common procedures at 3,000 health care facilities. Not surprisingly, it turns out hospital costs can vary greatly. In fact, a heart attack will only cost $3,300 in Arkansas, but a staggering $92,000 in California.



To read a breakdown of the report,

 Click here for more.


Coke to Stop Marketing to Children Under 12

As part of a broad anti-obesity campaign, Coca-Cola will no longer market to children under the age of 12.




The company is working on healthier alternatives, including lower calorie drinks. Ultimately, Coca-Cola wants consumer to accept its products as part of a healthy lifestyle.




In the past, the company has been blamed for providing the public with unhealthy, high calorie products.

 Click here for more.


Your Money

Should you convert your IRA into a Roth IRA?
 Click here for more.


For the Lawyers

Lodestar attorney’s fees should consider amount of recovery. The Minnesota Supreme Court held that the amount at stake in a lemon law case should have been considered in determining the reasonableness of attorney fees to be awarded under the lodestar method. The plaintiff recovered $230,000 in attorney fees and costs, based largely on over 600 hours billed by the plaintiff’s attorneys at $350 to $375 per hour. The state Supreme Court first concluded that the lodestar method is the proper approach for determining reasonable attorney fees under state lemon law. The court agreed with the defendant that the amount involved in the litigation and the results obtained must be considered when determining fees under the lodestar method. “It is true that a cap on fees or an examination of the proportionality between the amount of recovery and the fees expended could hamper the ability of consumers to vindicate their rights relative to inexpensive products. But ignoring, as the [trial] court did, the amount involved in the litigation contravenes the principles that underlie statutory attorney fees provisions….” “[Trial] courts, therefore, are directed to exclude from fee awards ‘hours that are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary, just as a lawyer in private practice ethically is obligated to exclude such hours from his fee submission.’ Because billing judgment is necessarily related to the merits of the case and the amount at issue in a consumer protection case, divorcing an award of attorney fees entirely from the amount at stake in the litigation would relieve attorneys from the need to exercise such judgment.”
Click here for more.

 

To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here.