The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert | |||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Subscribe to the Newsletter Helpful Links Texas Consumer Complaint Center Credit Reports and Identity Theft Your Guide to Small Claims Court Contact Us 1-713-743-2168 |
The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the DayWriting a post-dated check is a good idea when you don't have the money in the bank but will soon, right? Wrong! As a general rule a post-dated check may be paid by your bank at anytime. My advice: do not write a post-dated check if you don't have the money in the bank. Plastic Fragments Found in Frozen PizzasYou might want to double check that frozen pizza before you take a bite! How to Keep Your Smartphone SafeNearly 100 million Americans use a smartphone. What many of those users may not realize is that they're carrying around a device loaded with sensitive personal data. Colleges With the Best Return on InvestmentWith tuition costs on the rise, many students are struggling to make ends meet. Despite the cost, a degree is a requirement for most jobs with any true upward mobility. As a result, many students take a financial hit with hopes of future gains. Your MoneyHow much will minimum credit card payments cost you?
For the LawyersCredit card customer does not have to show identity theft to sue for violation of state credit card disclosure law. The Massachusetts Supreme Court held a credit card customer was not required to show that she was the victim of identity theft in order recover damages for a retailer’s violation of a state law prohibiting the disclosure of personal information on transaction forms. The plaintiff made several credit card purchases at a store in Massachusetts that is part of the defendant’s retail chain. In each transaction, the plaintiff provided her ZIP code as requested by a cashier. The plaintiff filed a class action in federal court, alleging that the defendant’s practice of requesting and recording customer ZIP codes violated a Massachusetts privacy statute that prohibits the recording of a card holder’s “personal identification information” in credit card transactions. The district court dismissed, finding no injury. The supreme court held that a plaintiff may bring an action for violation of the privacy statute without having to show identity theft.
|
||
To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here. |