The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert | |||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Subscribe to the Newsletter Helpful Links Texas Consumer Complaint Center Credit Reports and Identity Theft Your Guide to Small Claims Court Contact Us 1-713-743-2168 |
The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the DayDon't ever click on a link in an email message from a financial institution. There are so many scams involving fake emails from banks, credit unions, credit card companies, and other types of lenders that my advice is to assume everything you receive is fake. If you think it might be genuine, call the institution to verify it. Check the Screen for ATM FeesUntil now, federal law required banks to post fee alert stickers on ATM machines. Congress recently amended existing disclosure laws to eliminate the sticker requirement. As a result, it may no longer be readily apparent that the ATM you plan to use will charge for out-of-network usage. Walmart Allegedly Selling Fake iPadsAre you in the market for an iPad? Before you drop hundreds of dollars on the trendy tablet, open the box to make sure you're buying the real thing! Apple Password-Reset Security HoleIt has been a rough couple weeks at Apple. Just last week, Apple was forced to release a security update to resolve an iPhone lock-screen work-around. Your MoneyFind out how much you will pay for your mortgage with this amortization schedule calculator.
For the LawyersDefendant in FDCPA case does not have to show bad faith to recover attorney’s fees. The United States Supreme Court held that successful defendants in civil unfair debt collection claims can be awarded attorney fees and costs without a showing that the plaintiff brought the claim in bad faith. The case involved a debtor who sued to recover from a debt collector that sent a fax to her workplace. The action, she argued, violated the law’s provision barring debt collectors from contacting debtors’ employers.
After the debt collector was found not to have violated the Act, it sought and was awarded $4,500 in costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1), which provides that “[u]nless a federal statute, these rules, or a court order provides otherwise, costs — other than attorney’s fees — should be allowed to the prevailing party.”
The debtor appealed, arguing that under the FDCPA, costs can only be awarded “[o]n a finding by the court that an action [was] brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment.”
But in a an opinion authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Supreme Court disagreed, holding that the language of the FDCPA does not conflict with, and therefore does not displace, a district court’s discretion to award costs under Rule 54(d)(1).
|
||
To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here. |