The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert | |||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Subscribe to the Newsletter Helpful Links Texas Consumer Complaint Center Credit Reports and Identity Theft Your Guide to Small Claims Court Contact Us 1-713-743-2168 |
The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the DayTake advantage of the law and get a free copy of your credit report. There are three credit bureaus. Get a free report from one of them every four months. This way you can keep current. Click here for more. Debt Ceiling Debate Up NextBefore President Obama took office, Presidents never had any trouble getting congress to increase the debt limit. It was an important part of maintaining a stable marketplace, and was generally considered a procedural matter. In recent years, it has become more of a substantive issue. Congressional republicans have used the debt limit issue as a means of negotiating with the President and senate democrats on other issues, like privatizing social security. Democrats have suggested using a combination of spending cuts and tax increases to deal with the federal deficit. College Graduates Making More MoneyCollege graduates have reason to celebrate! They're making more money! More Tax Season Tips & TricksDo you qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)? It could save you a fortune in taxes! Your MoneyWhat is your net worth? Click here for more. For the Lawyers“Open and obvious” rule does not bar shopper’s negligence suit. The Nevada Supreme Court held a store could be liable for failing to protect a customer from tripping over an “open and obvious” hazard. The plaintiff sued Costco for negligence for injuries sustained when he tripped and fell over a wooden pallet that an employee had left in a store aisle. Costco argued that it did not breach a duty of care because the hazard created by the pallet was open and obvious. The state supreme court, recognizing the “evolution” of state premises liability law, held that the open and obvious nature of a dangerous condition no longer automatically relieves a property owner from the general duty of reasonable care. The court noted that “The fact that a dangerous condition may be open and obvious bears on the assessment of whether reasonable care was exercised by the landowner,” but held it is not a complete bar. Click here for more. |
||
To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here. |