The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert | |||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Subscribe to the Newsletter Helpful Links Texas Consumer Complaint Center Credit Reports and Identity Theft Your Guide to Small Claims Court Contact Us 1-713-743-2168 |
Happy Holidays! Have a safe holiday season and a very happy new year! See you in 2013!The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the DayWriting a post-dated check is a good idea when you don't have the money in the bank but will soon, right? Wrong! As a general rule a post-dated check may be paid by your bank at anytime. My advice: do not write a post-dated check if you don't have the money in the bank. Study: 55% of Americans Have Received Government Aid Over LifetimeOver the course of their lifetimes, 55% of Americans have received government aid through welfare benefits, medicaid, medicare, food stamps, social security, and/or unemployment benefits. 27% of Americans received unemployment during their lifetimes, making it the most popular of the government aid programs. Social Security was a close second at 26%. FCC Offers Free Smartphone Security CheckDid you know that your smartphone could be vulnerable to malware, virus', and phishing just like your home computer? Your MoneyWhat's the fastest and cheapest way to pay-down your debts? Click here for more. For the LawyersNon-signatory cannot enforce arbitration agreement. The Fifth Circuit held that an accounting firm could not compel its clients to arbitrate their claims that the accountants had fraudulently convinced them to invest in particular securities. The accounting firm held up an arbitration agreement between its clients and a third party, a securities broker, which said any dispute between the clients and the broker were arbitrable, including those between the clients and the broker’s “officers, directors, employees or agents.” The accounting firm argued that although it was not a party to that agreement, it was an agent of the broker, and could therefore enforce the arbitration agreement. The court concluded that the accountants could not compel arbitration because the actions of which their clients complained were not performed as agents of the securities broker. The court also concluded that the accountants could not rely on equitable estoppel principles to compel arbitration, primarily because the clients’ claims did not rely on the agreement between the clients and the broker. Click here for more. |
||
To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here. |