The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert | |||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Subscribe to the Newsletter Helpful Links Texas Consumer Complaint Center Credit Reports and Identity Theft Your Guide to Small Claims Court Contact Us 1-713-743-2168 |
The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the DayUnder the law, a store may charge no more than $30 for a bounced check. There is no limit for how much a bank may charge. Shop around for a bank that charges a reasonable fee, and get "overdraft protection" to avoid high fees for a bounced check. AT&T Settles FTC Charges Over Data PlansYou might want to check your latest phone bill. If you are an AT&T customer and have been grandfathered in to the company's unlimited data plan, AT&T may have moved you to a monthly tiered plan without your knowledge. After receiving complaints, the FTC found that consumers who replaced their phones under warranty or insurance were moved to the tiered plans without consent. On Tuesday, AT&T agreed to pay the government a $700,000 fine and offer refunds to affected consumers. Two States Legalize Sale & Use of MarijuanaTuesday's election wasn't just about electing the next President. Residents in two states voted to legalize the possession and sale of recreational marijuana. Once certified, marijuana will be regulated and taxed in Washington state and Colorado. Your MoneyWhat is the true cost of paying the minimum on your credit card? Click here for more. For the LawyersThe Ninth Circuit held that Best Buy violated federal consumer protection law by placing automated, prerecorded calls notifying a customer of the status of his membership in a store “rewards” program. The plaintiff alleged that, after buying a computer from Best Buy, he began to receive prerecorded calls from the retailer, even though he was registered on the national do-not-call list and later added to the retailer’s do-not-call list. The plaintiff filed a class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act after he received an automated call notifying him of changes in the terms of his membership in a store rewards program. Best Buy argued that its calls were purely informational courtesy calls permitted under the Act. The court disagreed. Click here for more. |
||
To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here. |