The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert | |||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Subscribe to the Newsletter Helpful Links Texas Consumer Complaint Center Credit Reports and Identity Theft Your Guide to Small Claims Court Contact Us 1-713-743-2168 |
The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the DayTexas generally does not allow your wages to be garnished, even if you are sued. The exceptions are debts for child support, student loans and certain taxes. Click here for more. Facebook Privacy Settings & UpdatesWith 955 million unique users, chances are high that you, or someone you know, uses Facebook. Today, we take a look at some important Facebook news and updates. Lawsuit Alleges Travel Site Price FixingHave hotel prices seemed a little high recently? Two plaintiffs out of Iowa, represented by a Seattle a law firm, are alleging that several major hotel companies have been conspiring with travel websites to set a minimum room rate for consumers. The lawsuit, filed Monday in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco, primarily focuses on Hilton Hotels, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts, and Marriott International conspiring with Expedia, Travelocity, and Priceline. In essence, the lawsuit alleges that the sites offer only cosmetic differences with the same prices offered on every site, creating the illusion that consumers can spend time "researching" the Internet for good deals. Your MoneyHow much of your social security benefit may be taxed? Click here for more. For the LawyersLawyer cannot enforce arbitration agreement in retainer contract. The Supreme Court of Louisiana held that an attorney could not enforce an arbitration clause when a former client sued him for malpractice. The plaintiff argued that the arbitration clause could not be enforced because the state’s rules of professional conduct prohibit lawyers from limiting liability to a client unless the client is independently represented by counsel when the retainer agreement is negotiated. The state supreme court rejected a per se rule against arbitration clauses in attorney-client retainer agreements. However, the court emphasized that such provisions must be “fair and reasonable” to the client. In this case, the court decided that the defendant’s arbitration clause was unenforceable because he failed to make the necessary disclosures to the plaintiff. Click here for more. |
||
To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here. |