The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert | |||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
Subscribe to the Newsletter Helpful Links Texas Consumer Complaint Center Credit Reports and Identity Theft Your Guide to Small Claims Court Contact Us 1-713-743-2168 |
The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the DayNever give your social security number to someone you do not know. Identity theft requires a social security number. Protect yours. Click here for more. Health Care - SCOTUS Hearings BeginStarting today (Monday, March 26, 2012), the Supreme Court of the United States will hear arguments Woman Busted After Avoiding Jury DutyHave you ever been called for jury duty? It can be inconvenient, time consuming, and exhausting, but it is an essential public service to keep the Scales of Justice in balance. DEA Warns Public of Extortion ScamThe Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is warning the public of an international extortion scheme involving criminals posing as DEA agents. The scam targets individuals who previously purchased prescription drugs over the Internet, telling the individuals that they must pay a fine (usually to an overseas location) or face arrest. If you believe that you're a victim of this scam, contact 1-877-792-2873. Click here for more. Your MoneyCalculate your credit risk! Click here for more. For the LawyersLaw Firm did not violate Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The Eight Circuit held that a law firm didn't violate federal debt collection law by submitting a client affidavit and legal memorandum arguing that the plaintiff was liable for her former husband's unpaid credit card balance. According to the plaintiff, the firm violated ยง1692e of the Act by making false statements and misrepresentations in its filings in the state court collection action. The court noted, "It was not false or misleading to submit a client affidavit and legal memorandum arguing [the firm's] legal position that [the plaintiff] was liable for the unpaid account balance, even if [her ex-husband] was the only one who used the credit card and made partial payments on the account, when Discover's records reflected that [he] submitted the initial application, added [the plaintiff] to the account by phone, neither spouse questioned statements identifying it as a joint account, partial payments were made by checks from a joint account, and a [divorce agreement] signed by [the plaintiff] listed it as a joint obligation for the couple's living expenses." Click here for more. |
||
To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here. |