The People's Lawyer Consumer News Alert
Center for Consumer Law
  Volume 55 Number 10

Subscribe to the Newsletter
Forward this news alert to your family and friends

Helpful Links

Texas Consumer Complaint Center

Your Rights as a Tenant

Credit Reports and Identity Theft

Your Guide to Small Claims Court

Common Q & A’s

Scam Alert

Back Issues

Contact Us

http://www.peopleslawyer.net

1-713-743-2168

Unsubscribe

The People’s Lawyer’s Tip of the Day

The law limits how long you may be sued for a debt. In Texas most debts have a four year limitation period. If you are sued after that time, you have a defense based on what the law calls the "statute of limitations."  Click here for more.


States Settle With Publishers Clearing House

How does $1 million plus $5,000 a week for life sound? Publishers Clearing House has made millions by making consumers believe they were likely to win. According to 32 states and the District of Columbia, Publishers Clearing House used misleading statements to encourage consumers to participate in the sweepstakes. After ignoring two previous consent judgments preventing the company from using deceptive marketing, Publishers Clearing House must now shell out $3.5 million and make permanent changes to its marketing materials. Click here for more.


Vote in Upcoming Elections

The midterm elections are here. Early voting has started in most states. To find out how you can vote, Click here for more.


Your Money

Are you self-employed? Try this tax calculator! Click here for more.


For the Lawyers

Satellite TV customers may proceed as a class. The Eleventh Circuit held that customers could proceed as a class in federal court, even though no single customer could meet the jurisdictional amount. “The putative class [in this case] exceeded 100 persons, and the amount of controversy - in the aggregate - exceeded $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs. As the plaintiff class was comprised entirely of Georgia residents, there was sufficient diversity, since DirecTV is a California corporation. These factors alone were sufficient to allow the district court to exercise subject matter jurisdiction, and the further requirements and exceptions to jurisdiction under [the Act] neither apply nor warrant discussion here.” Click here for more.

 

To stop receiving email news alerts from the Center for Consumer Law, please click here.